0
U.S. (TOLL FREE)
+1 (315) 215-3225
Automative

0
U.S. (TOLL FREE)
+1 (315) 215-3225
Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Outlook, In‑Depth Analysis & Forecast to 2031
Published Date: November 2025
|
Report Code: QYRE-Auto-24C16749
Home | Market Reports | Business & Industrial| Chemicals Industry
Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Research Report 2024
BUY CHAPTERS

Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Outlook, In‑Depth Analysis & Forecast to 2031

Code: QYRE-Auto-24C16749
Report
November 2025
Pages:157
QYResearch
Buy Now with 15% Discount
DESCRIPTION
TABLE OF CONTENT
TABLES & FIGURES

Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size

The global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material market is projected to grow from US$ 311 million in 2024 to US$ 407 million by 2031, at a CAGR of 4.0% (2025-2031), driven by critical product segments and diverse end‑use applications.

Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market

Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market

From a downstream perspective, Communication accounted for % of 2024 revenue, surging to US$ million by 2031 (CAGR: % from 2025–2031).
Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material leading manufacturers including Cuming Microwave, Parker Hannifin, Hexcel, Laird, 3M, TDK, Shenzhen HFC, Tech-Etch, Leader Tech, No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics, etc., dominate supply; the top five capture approximately % of global revenue, with Cuming Microwave leading 2024 sales at US$ million.
Regional Outlook:
North America rose from US$ million in 2024 to a forecast US$ million by 2031 (CAGR %).
Asia‑Pacific will expand from US$ million to US$ million (CAGR  %), led by China (US$ million in 2024, % share rising to % by 2031), Japan (CAGR %), South Korea (CAGR %), and Southeast Asia (CAGR %).
Europe is set to grow from US$ million to US$ million (CAGR %), with Germany projected to hit US$ million by 2031 (CAGR %).

Report Includes:

This definitive report equips CEOs, marketing directors, and investors with a 360° view of the global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material market across value chain. It analyzes historical revenue data (2020–2024) and delivers forecasts through 2031, illuminating demand trends and growth drivers.
By segmenting the market by Type and by Application, the study quantifies market size, growth rates, niche opportunities, and substitution risks, and analyzes downstream customers distribution pattern.
Granular regional insights cover five major markets—North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and MEA—with in‑depth analysis of 20+ countries, detailing dominant products, competitive landscape, and downstream demand trends.
Critical competitive intelligence profiles players—revenue, margins, pricing strategies, and major customers—and dissects the top-player positioning across product lines, applications, and regions to reveal strategic strengths.
A concise Industry‑chain overview maps upstream, middlestream, and downstream distribution dynamics to identify strategic gaps and unmet demand.
Market Segmentation

Scope of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Report

Report Metric Details
Report Name Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market
Accounted market size in 2024 US$ 311 million
Forecasted market size in 2031 US$ 407 million
CAGR 4.0%
Base Year 2024
Forecasted years 2025 - 2031
Segment by Type
  • Ferrite
  • Barium Titanate
  • Graphite
  • Silicon Carbide
  • Others
Segment by Application
  • Communication
  • Defense & Aerospace
  • Others
Sales by Region
  • North America (United States, Canada)
  • Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia) Rest of Europe
  • Nordic Countries
  • Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea)
  • Southeast Asia (India, Australia)
  • Rest of Asia
  • Latin America (Mexico, Brazil)
  • Rest of Latin America
  • Middle East & Africa (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of MEA)
By Company Cuming Microwave, Parker Hannifin, Hexcel, Laird, 3M, TDK, Shenzhen HFC, Tech-Etch, Leader Tech, No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics, Jones Tech, Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology, Beijing Bgrimm New Materials, Mast Technologies, Holland Shielding Systems, EMI Thermal
Forecast units USD million in value
Report coverage Revenue and volume forecast, company share, competitive landscape, growth factors and trends

Chapter Outline

  • Chapter 1: Defines the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material study scope, segments the market by Type and by Application, etc, highlights segment size and growth potential.
  • Chapter 2: Offers current market state, projects global revenue and sales to 2031, pinpointing high consumption regions and emerging market catalysts
  • Chapter 3: Dissects the player landscape—ranks by revenue and profitability, details Player performance by product type and evaluates concentration alongside M&A moves.
  • Chapter 4: Unlocks high margin product segments—compares revenue, ASP, and technology differentiators, highlighting growth niches and substitution risks
  • Chapter 5: Targets downstream market opportunities—evaluates market size by Application, identifies emerging use cases, and profiles leading customers by region and by Application.
  • Chapter 6: North America—breaks down market size by Type, by Application and country, profiles key players and assesses growth drivers and barriers.
  • Chapter 7: Europe—analyses regional market by Type, by Application and players, flagging drivers and barriers.
  • Chapter 8: Asia Pacific—quantifies market size by Type, by Application, and region/country, profiles top players, and uncovers high potential expansion areas.
  • Chapter 9: Central & South America—measures market size by Type, by Application, and country, profiles top players, and identifies investment opportunities and challenges.
  • Chapter 10: Middle East and Africa—evaluates market size by Type, by Application, and country, profiles key players, and outlines investment prospects and market hurdles
  • Chapter 11: Profiles players in depth—details product specs, revenue, margins; Top-tier players 2024 sales breakdowns by Product type, by Application, by region SWOT analysis, and recent strategic developments.
  • Chapter 12: Industry chain—analyses upstream, cost drivers, plus downstream channels.
  • Chapter 13: Market dynamics—explores drivers, restraints, regulatory impacts, and risk mitigation strategies.
  • Chapter 14: Actionable conclusions and strategic recommendations.
  • Why This Report:
  • Beyond standard market data, this analysis provides a clear profitability roadmap—empowering you to:
  • Allocate capital strategically to high growth regions (Chapters 6–10) and margin rich segments (Chapter 5).
  • Negotiate from strength with suppliers (Chapter 12) and customers (Chapter 5) using cost and demand intelligence.
  • Outmaneuver competitors with granular insights into their operations, margins, and strategies (Chapters 3 and 11).
  • Capitalize on the projected billion‑dollar opportunity with data‑driven regional and segment tactics (Chapter 12-14).
  • Leverage this 360° intelligence to turn market complexity into actionable competitive advantage.

FAQ for this report

How fast is Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market growing?

Ans: The Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market witnessing a CAGR of 4.0% during the forecast period 2025-2031.

What is the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market size in 2031?

Ans: The Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market size in 2031 will be US$ 407 million.

Who are the main players in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report?

Ans: The main players in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market are Cuming Microwave, Parker Hannifin, Hexcel, Laird, 3M, TDK, Shenzhen HFC, Tech-Etch, Leader Tech, No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics, Jones Tech, Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology, Beijing Bgrimm New Materials, Mast Technologies, Holland Shielding Systems, EMI Thermal

What are the Application segmentation covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report?

Ans: The Applications covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report are Communication, Defense & Aerospace, Others

What are the Type segmentation covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report?

Ans: The Types covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report are Ferrite, Barium Titanate, Graphite, Silicon Carbide, Others

1 Study Coverage
1.1 Introduction to Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material: Definition, Properties, and Key Attributes
1.2 Market Segmentation by Type
1.2.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Type, 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
1.2.2 Ferrite
1.2.3 Barium Titanate
1.2.4 Graphite
1.2.5 Silicon Carbide
1.2.6 Others
1.3 Market Segmentation by Application
1.3.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application, 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
1.3.2 Communication
1.3.3 Defense & Aerospace
1.3.4 Others
1.4 Assumptions and Limitations
1.5 Study Objectives
1.6 Years Considered
2 Executive Summary
2.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Estimates and Forecasts 2020-2031
2.2 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Region
2.2.1 Revenue Comparison: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
2.2.2 Historical and Forecasted Revenue by Region (2020-2031)
2.2.3 Global Revenue Market Share by Region (2020-2031)
2.2.4 Emerging Market Focus: Growth Drivers & Investment Trends
3 Competition by Players
3.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Player Revenue Rankings and Profitability
3.1.1 Global Revenue (Value) by Players (2020-2025)
3.1.2 Global Key Player Revenue Ranking (2023 vs. 2024)
3.1.3 Revenue-Based Tier Segmentation (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.1.4 Gross Margin by Top Player (2020 VS 2024)
3.2 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Companies Headquarters and Service Footprint
3.3 Main Product Type Market Size by Players
3.3.1 Ferrite Market Size by Players
3.3.2 Barium Titanate Market Size by Players
3.3.3 Graphite Market Size by Players
3.3.4 Silicon Carbide Market Size by Players
3.3.5 Others Market Size by Players
3.4 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Concentration and Dynamics
3.4.1 Global Market Concentration (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Entrant/Exit Impact Analysis
3.4.3 Strategic Moves: M&A, Expansion, R&D Investment
4 Global Product Segmentation Analysis
4.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Trends by Type
4.1.1 Global Historical and Forecasted Revenue by Type (2020-2031)
4.1.2 Global Revenue Market Share by Type (2020-2031)
4.2 Key Product Attributes and Differentiation
4.3 Subtype Dynamics: Growth Leaders, Profitability and Risk
4.3.1 High-Growth Niches and Adoption Drivers
4.3.2 Profitability Hotspots and Cost Drivers
4.3.3 Substitution Threats
5 Global Downstream Application Analysis
5.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application
5.1.1 Global Historical and Forecasted Revenue by Application (2020-2031)
5.1.2 Revenue Market Share by Application (2020-2031)
5.1.3 High-Growth Application Identification
5.1.4 Emerging Application Case Studies
5.2 Downstream Customer Analysis
5.2.1 Top Customers by Region
5.2.2 Top Customers by Application
6 North America
6.1 North America Market Size (2020-2031)
6.2 North America Key Players Revenue in 2024
6.3 North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Type (2020-2031)
6.4 North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application (2020-2031)
6.5 North America Growth Accelerators and Market Barriers
6.6 North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country
6.6.1 North America Revenue Trends by Country
6.6.2 US
6.6.3 Canada
6.6.4 Mexico
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Market Size (2020-2031)
7.2 Europe Key Players Revenue in 2024
7.3 Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Type (2020-2031)
7.4 Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application (2020-2031)
7.5 Europe Growth Accelerators and Market Barriers
7.6 Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country
7.6.1 Europe Revenue Trends by Country
7.6.2 Germany
7.6.3 France
7.6.4 U.K.
7.6.5 Italy
7.6.6 Russia
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Market Size (2020-2031)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Key Players Revenue in 2024
8.3 Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Type (2020-2031)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application (2020-2031)
8.5 Asia-Pacific Growth Accelerators and Market Barriers
8.6 Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region
8.6.1 Asia-Pacific Revenue Trends by Region
8.7 China
8.8 Japan
8.9 South Korea
8.10 Australia
8.11 India
8.12 Southeast Asia
8.12.1 Indonesia
8.12.2 Vietnam
8.12.3 Malaysia
8.12.4 Philippines
8.12.5 Singapore
9 Central and South America
9.1 Central and South America Market Size (2020-2031)
9.2 Central and South America Key Players Revenue in 2024
9.3 Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Type (2020-2031)
9.4 Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application (2020-2031)
9.5 Central and South America Investment Opportunities and Key Challenges
9.6 Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country
9.6.1 Central and South America Revenue Trends by Country (2020 VS 2024 VS 2031)
9.6.2 Brazil
9.6.3 Argentina
10 Middle East and Africa
10.1 Middle East and Africa Market Size (2020-2031)
10.2 Middle East and Africa Key Players Revenue in 2024
10.3 Middle East and Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Type (2020-2031)
10.4 Middle East and Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application (2020-2031)
10.5 Middle East and Africa Investment Opportunities and Key Challenges
10.6 Middle East and Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country
10.6.1 Middle East and Africa Revenue Trends by Country (2020 VS 2024 VS 2031)
10.6.2 GCC Countries
10.6.3 Israel
10.6.4 Egypt
10.6.5 South Africa
11 Corporate Profile
11.1 Cuming Microwave
11.1.1 Cuming Microwave Corporation Information
11.1.2 Cuming Microwave Business Overview
11.1.3 Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.1.4 Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.1.5 Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Product in 2024
11.1.6 Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application in 2024
11.1.7 Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Geographic Area in 2024
11.1.8 Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
11.1.9 Cuming Microwave Recent Developments
11.2 Parker Hannifin
11.2.1 Parker Hannifin Corporation Information
11.2.2 Parker Hannifin Business Overview
11.2.3 Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.2.4 Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.2.5 Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Product in 2024
11.2.6 Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application in 2024
11.2.7 Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Geographic Area in 2024
11.2.8 Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
11.2.9 Parker Hannifin Recent Developments
11.3 Hexcel
11.3.1 Hexcel Corporation Information
11.3.2 Hexcel Business Overview
11.3.3 Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.3.4 Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.3.5 Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Product in 2024
11.3.6 Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application in 2024
11.3.7 Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Geographic Area in 2024
11.3.8 Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
11.3.9 Hexcel Recent Developments
11.4 Laird
11.4.1 Laird Corporation Information
11.4.2 Laird Business Overview
11.4.3 Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.4.4 Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.4.5 Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Product in 2024
11.4.6 Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application in 2024
11.4.7 Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Geographic Area in 2024
11.4.8 Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
11.4.9 Laird Recent Developments
11.5 3M
11.5.1 3M Corporation Information
11.5.2 3M Business Overview
11.5.3 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.5.4 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.5.5 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Product in 2024
11.5.6 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application in 2024
11.5.7 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Geographic Area in 2024
11.5.8 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
11.5.9 3M Recent Developments
11.6 TDK
11.6.1 TDK Corporation Information
11.6.2 TDK Business Overview
11.6.3 TDK Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.6.4 TDK Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.6.5 TDK Recent Developments
11.7 Shenzhen HFC
11.7.1 Shenzhen HFC Corporation Information
11.7.2 Shenzhen HFC Business Overview
11.7.3 Shenzhen HFC Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.7.4 Shenzhen HFC Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.7.5 Shenzhen HFC Recent Developments
11.8 Tech-Etch
11.8.1 Tech-Etch Corporation Information
11.8.2 Tech-Etch Business Overview
11.8.3 Tech-Etch Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.8.4 Tech-Etch Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.8.5 Tech-Etch Recent Developments
11.9 Leader Tech
11.9.1 Leader Tech Corporation Information
11.9.2 Leader Tech Business Overview
11.9.3 Leader Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.9.4 Leader Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.9.5 Leader Tech Recent Developments
11.10 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics
11.10.1 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Corporation Information
11.10.2 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Business Overview
11.10.3 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.10.4 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.10.5 Company Ten Recent Developments
11.11 Jones Tech
11.11.1 Jones Tech Corporation Information
11.11.2 Jones Tech Business Overview
11.11.3 Jones Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.11.4 Jones Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.11.5 Jones Tech Recent Developments
11.12 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology
11.12.1 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Corporation Information
11.12.2 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Business Overview
11.12.3 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.12.4 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.12.5 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Recent Developments
11.13 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials
11.13.1 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Corporation Information
11.13.2 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Business Overview
11.13.3 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.13.4 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.13.5 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Recent Developments
11.14 Mast Technologies
11.14.1 Mast Technologies Corporation Information
11.14.2 Mast Technologies Business Overview
11.14.3 Mast Technologies Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.14.4 Mast Technologies Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.14.5 Mast Technologies Recent Developments
11.15 Holland Shielding Systems
11.15.1 Holland Shielding Systems Corporation Information
11.15.2 Holland Shielding Systems Business Overview
11.15.3 Holland Shielding Systems Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.15.4 Holland Shielding Systems Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.15.5 Holland Shielding Systems Recent Developments
11.16 EMI Thermal
11.16.1 EMI Thermal Corporation Information
11.16.2 EMI Thermal Business Overview
11.16.3 EMI Thermal Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Features and Attributes
11.16.4 EMI Thermal Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
11.16.5 EMI Thermal Recent Developments
12 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing MaterialIndustry Chain Analysis
12.1 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Industry Chain
12.2 Upstream Analysis
12.2.1 Upstream Key Suppliers
12.3 Middlestream Analysis
12.4 Downstream Sales Model and Distribution Networks
12.4.1 Sales Channels
12.4.2 Distributors
13 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Dynamics
13.1 Industry Trends and Evolution
13.2 Market Growth Drivers and Emerging Opportunities
13.3 Market Challenges, Risks, and Restraints
14 Key Findings in the Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Study
15 Appendix
15.1 Research Methodology
15.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
15.1.1.1 Research Programs/Design
15.1.1.2 Market Size Estimation
15.1.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
15.1.2 Data Source
15.1.2.1 Secondary Sources
15.1.2.2 Primary Sources
15.2 Author Details
List of Tables
 Table 1. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Type, 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Table 2. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Application, 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Table 3. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Grow Rate (CAGR) by Region: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Table 4. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Region (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Table 5. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Region (2026-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Table 6. Emerging Market Revenue Grow Rate (CAGR) by Country (2020 VS 2024 VS 2031) (US$ Million)
 Table 7. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Players (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Table 8. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Players (2020-2025)
 Table 9. Global Key Players’Ranking Shift (2023 vs. 2024) (Based on Revenue)
 Table 10. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material by Player Tier (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3) & (based on the Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material as of 2024)
 Table 11. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Average Gross Margin (%) by Player (2020 VS 2024)
 Table 12. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Companies Headquarters
 Table 13. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
 Table 14. Key Market Entrant/Exit (2020-2024) – Drivers & Impact Analysis
 Table 15. Key Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans, R&D Investment
 Table 16. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Type (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Table 17. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Type (2026-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Table 18. Key Product Attributes and Differentiation
 Table 19. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Table 20. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Application (2026-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Table 21. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material High-Growth Sectors Demand CAGR (2024-2031)
 Table 22. Top Customers by Region
 Table 23. Top Customers by Application
 Table 24. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Growth Accelerators and Market Barriers
 Table 25. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Grow Rate (CAGR) by Country (2020 VS 2024 VS 2031) (US$ Million)
 Table 26. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Growth Accelerators and Market Barriers
 Table 27. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Grow Rate (CAGR) by Country: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Table 28. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Growth Accelerators and Market Barriers
 Table 29. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Grow Rate (CAGR) by Region: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Table 30. Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Investment Opportunities and Key Challenges
 Table 31. Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Grow Rate (CAGR) by Country (2020 VS 2024 VS 2031) (US$ Million)
 Table 32. Middle East and Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Investment Opportunities and Key Challenges
 Table 33. Middle East and Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Grow Rate (CAGR) by Country (2020 VS 2024 VS 2031) (US$ Million)
 Table 34. Cuming Microwave Corporation Information
 Table 35. Cuming Microwave Description and Major Businesses
 Table 36. Cuming Microwave Product Features and Attributes
 Table 37. Cuming Microwave Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 38. Cuming Microwave Revenue Proportion by Product in 2024
 Table 39. Cuming Microwave Revenue Proportion by Application in 2024
 Table 40. Cuming Microwave Revenue Proportion by Geographic Area in 2024
 Table 41. Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
 Table 42. Cuming Microwave Recent Developments
 Table 43. Parker Hannifin Corporation Information
 Table 44. Parker Hannifin Description and Major Businesses
 Table 45. Parker Hannifin Product Features and Attributes
 Table 46. Parker Hannifin Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 47. Parker Hannifin Revenue Proportion by Product in 2024
 Table 48. Parker Hannifin Revenue Proportion by Application in 2024
 Table 49. Parker Hannifin Revenue Proportion by Geographic Area in 2024
 Table 50. Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
 Table 51. Parker Hannifin Recent Developments
 Table 52. Hexcel Corporation Information
 Table 53. Hexcel Description and Major Businesses
 Table 54. Hexcel Product Features and Attributes
 Table 55. Hexcel Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 56. Hexcel Revenue Proportion by Product in 2024
 Table 57. Hexcel Revenue Proportion by Application in 2024
 Table 58. Hexcel Revenue Proportion by Geographic Area in 2024
 Table 59. Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
 Table 60. Hexcel Recent Developments
 Table 61. Laird Corporation Information
 Table 62. Laird Description and Major Businesses
 Table 63. Laird Product Features and Attributes
 Table 64. Laird Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 65. Laird Revenue Proportion by Product in 2024
 Table 66. Laird Revenue Proportion by Application in 2024
 Table 67. Laird Revenue Proportion by Geographic Area in 2024
 Table 68. Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
 Table 69. Laird Recent Developments
 Table 70. 3M Corporation Information
 Table 71. 3M Description and Major Businesses
 Table 72. 3M Product Features and Attributes
 Table 73. 3M Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 74. 3M Revenue Proportion by Product in 2024
 Table 75. 3M Revenue Proportion by Application in 2024
 Table 76. 3M Revenue Proportion by Geographic Area in 2024
 Table 77. 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material SWOT Analysis
 Table 78. 3M Recent Developments
 Table 79. TDK Corporation Information
 Table 80. TDK Description and Major Businesses
 Table 81. TDK Product Features and Attributes
 Table 82. TDK Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 83. TDK Recent Developments
 Table 84. Shenzhen HFC Corporation Information
 Table 85. Shenzhen HFC Description and Major Businesses
 Table 86. Shenzhen HFC Product Features and Attributes
 Table 87. Shenzhen HFC Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 88. Shenzhen HFC Recent Developments
 Table 89. Tech-Etch Corporation Information
 Table 90. Tech-Etch Description and Major Businesses
 Table 91. Tech-Etch Product Features and Attributes
 Table 92. Tech-Etch Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 93. Tech-Etch Recent Developments
 Table 94. Leader Tech Corporation Information
 Table 95. Leader Tech Description and Major Businesses
 Table 96. Leader Tech Product Features and Attributes
 Table 97. Leader Tech Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 98. Leader Tech Recent Developments
 Table 99. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Corporation Information
 Table 100. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Description and Major Businesses
 Table 101. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Product Features and Attributes
 Table 102. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 103. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Recent Developments
 Table 104. Jones Tech Corporation Information
 Table 105. Jones Tech Description and Major Businesses
 Table 106. Jones Tech Product Features and Attributes
 Table 107. Jones Tech Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 108. Jones Tech Recent Developments
 Table 109. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Corporation Information
 Table 110. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Description and Major Businesses
 Table 111. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Product Features and Attributes
 Table 112. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 113. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Recent Developments
 Table 114. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Corporation Information
 Table 115. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Description and Major Businesses
 Table 116. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Product Features and Attributes
 Table 117. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 118. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Recent Developments
 Table 119. Mast Technologies Corporation Information
 Table 120. Mast Technologies Description and Major Businesses
 Table 121. Mast Technologies Product Features and Attributes
 Table 122. Mast Technologies Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 123. Mast Technologies Recent Developments
 Table 124. Holland Shielding Systems Corporation Information
 Table 125. Holland Shielding Systems Description and Major Businesses
 Table 126. Holland Shielding Systems Product Features and Attributes
 Table 127. Holland Shielding Systems Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 128. Holland Shielding Systems Recent Developments
 Table 129. EMI Thermal Corporation Information
 Table 130. EMI Thermal Description and Major Businesses
 Table 131. EMI Thermal Product Features and Attributes
 Table 132. EMI Thermal Revenue (US$ Million) and Gross Margin (2020-2025)
 Table 133. EMI Thermal Recent Developments
 Table 134. Raw Materials Key Suppliers
 Table 135. Distributors List
 Table 136. Market Trends and Market Evolution
 Table 137. Market Drivers and Opportunities
 Table 138. Market Challenges, Risks, and Restraints
 Table 139. Research Programs/Design for This Report
 Table 140. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
 Table 141. Key Data Information from Primary Sources


List of Figures
 Figure 1. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product Picture
 Figure 2. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Type, 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Figure 3. Ferrite Product Picture
 Figure 4. Barium Titanate Product Picture
 Figure 5. Graphite Product Picture
 Figure 6. Silicon Carbide Product Picture
 Figure 7. Others Product Picture
 Figure 8. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Application, 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Figure 9. Communication
 Figure 10. Defense & Aerospace
 Figure 11. Others
 Figure 12. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Report Years Considered
 Figure 13. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue, (US$ Million), 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031
 Figure 14. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 15. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (CAGR) by Region: 2020 VS 2024 VS 2031 (US$ Million)
 Figure 16. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Region (2020-2031)
 Figure 17. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share Ranking (2024)
 Figure 18. Tier Distribution by Revenue Contribution (2020 VS 2024)
 Figure 19. Ferrite Revenue Market Share by Player in 2024
 Figure 20. Barium Titanate Revenue Market Share by Player in 2024
 Figure 21. Graphite Revenue Market Share by Player in 2024
 Figure 22. Silicon Carbide Revenue Market Share by Player in 2024
 Figure 23. Others Revenue Market Share by Player in 2024
 Figure 24. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Type (2020-2031)
 Figure 25. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Application (2020-2031)
 Figure 26. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue YoY (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 27. North America Top 5 Players Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) in 2024
 Figure 28. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Type (2020 - 2031)
 Figure 29. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Application (2020-2031)
 Figure 30. US Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 31. Canada Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 32. Mexico Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 33. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue YoY (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 34. Europe Top 5 Players Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) in 2024
 Figure 35. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Type (2020-2031)
 Figure 36. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Application (2020-2031)
 Figure 37. Germany Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 38. France Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 39. U.K. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 40. Italy Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 41. Russia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 42. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue YoY (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 43. Asia-Pacific Top 8 Players Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) in 2024
 Figure 44. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Type (2020-2031)
 Figure 45. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Application (2020-2031)
 Figure 46. Indonesia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 47. Japan Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 48. South Korea Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 49. Australia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 50. India Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 51. Indonesia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 52. Vietnam Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 53. Malaysia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 54. Philippines Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 55. Singapore Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 56. Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue YoY (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 57. Central and South America Top 5 Players Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) in 2024
 Figure 58. Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Type (2020-2031)
 Figure 59. Central and South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Application (2020-2031)
 Figure 60. Brazil Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 61. Argentina Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 62. Middle East and Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue YoY (2020-2031) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 63. Middle East and Africa Top 5 Players Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) in 2024
 Figure 64. South America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Type (2020-2031)
 Figure 65. Middle East and Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (US$ Million) by Application (2020-2031)
 Figure 66. GCC Countries Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 67. Israel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 68. Egypt Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 69. South Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (2020-2025) & (US$ Million)
 Figure 70. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Industry Chain Mapping
 Figure 71. Channels of Distribution (Direct Vs Distribution)
 Figure 72. Bottom-up and Top-down Approaches for This Report
 Figure 73. Data Triangulation
 Figure 74. Key Executives Interviewed
SELECT A FORMAT
Added to Cart
Electronic (PDF)

$4900

This license allows only one user to access the PDF.
Electronic (PDF)

$7350

This license allows 1 - 5 user to access the PDF, license is suitable for small groups of 5 users working together
Electronic (PDF)

$9800

This license allows users/teams in a same Enterprise to use this report, various departments within an enterpise can use this report
Add to Cart
Buy Now (15% Discount)

OUR CUSTOMER

Bioinformatics Barcelona