aluates Reports

$ 0.0

Automative

Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Research Report 2024

Published Date: April 2024

Report Code: QYRE-Auto-24C16749

BUY CHAPTERS

Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Research Report 2024

Code: QYRE-Auto-24C16749

Report

April 2024

Pages:91

QYResearch

Buy Now with 15% Discount

DESCRIPTION

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLES & FIGURES

FEATURED COMPANIES

Companies

Cuming Microwave

Parker Hannifin

Hexcel

Laird

TDK

Shenzhen HFC

Tech-Etch

Leader Tech

No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics

Jones Tech

Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology

Beijing Bgrimm New Materials

Mast Technologies

Holland Shielding Systems

EMI Thermal

Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size

The global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material market was valued at US$ 297 million in 2023 and is anticipated to reach US$ 393 million by 2030, witnessing a CAGR of 4.0% during the forecast period 2024-2030.

Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market

North American market for Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2030, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2024 through 2030.

Asia-Pacific market for Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2030, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2024 through 2030.

The global market for Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material in Communication is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to $ million by 2030, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2024 through 2030.

The major global companies of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material include Cuming Microwave, Parker Hannifin, Hexcel, Laird, 3M, TDK, Shenzhen HFC, Tech-Etch, Leader Tech, No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics, etc. In 2023, the world's top three vendors accounted for approximately % of the revenue.

This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material, with both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material.

The Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of and revenue ($ millions), considering 2023 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2019 to 2030. This report segments the global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material market comprehensively. Regional market sizes, concerning products by Type, by Application, and by players, are also provided.

For a more in-depth understanding of the market, the report provides profiles of the competitive landscape, key competitors, and their respective market ranks. The report also discusses technological trends and new product developments.

The report will help the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material companies, new entrants, and industry chain related companies in this market with information on the revenues for the overall market and the sub-segments across the different segments, by company, by Type, by Application, and by regions.

Market Segmentation

Scope of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Report

Report Metric	Details
Report Name	Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market
Accounted market size in 2023	US$ 297 million
Forecasted market size in 2030	US$ 393 million
CAGR	4.0%
Base Year	2023
Forecasted years	2024 - 2030
Segment by Type	Ferrite Barium Titanate Graphite Silicon Carbide Others
Segment by Application	Communication Defense & Aerospace Others
By Region	North America (United States, Canada) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia) Rest of Europe Nordic Countries Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea) Southeast Asia (India, Australia) Rest of Asia Latin America (Mexico, Brazil) Rest of Latin America Middle East & Africa (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Rest of MEA)
By Company	Cuming Microwave, Parker Hannifin, Hexcel, Laird, 3M, TDK, Shenzhen HFC, Tech-Etch, Leader Tech, No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics, Jones Tech, Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology, Beijing Bgrimm New Materials, Mast Technologies, Holland Shielding Systems, EMI Thermal
Forecast units	USD million in value
Report coverage	Revenue and volume forecast, company share, competitive landscape, growth factors and trends

Chapter Outline

Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, executive summary of different market segments (by Type, by Application, etc), including the market size of each market segment, future development potential, and so on. It offers a high-level view of the current state of the market and its likely evolution in the short to mid-term, and long term.
Chapter 2: Introduces executive summary of global market size, regional market size, this section also introduces the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by companies in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 3: Detailed analysis of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material company competitive landscape, revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by Type, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments by Application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa segment by country. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and its main countries and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and capacity of each country in the world.
Chapter 11: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the main companies in the market in detail, including product sales, revenue, price, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 12: The main points and conclusions of the report.

FAQ for this report

How fast is Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market growing?

Ans: The Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market witnessing a CAGR of 4.0% during the forecast period 2024-2030.

What is the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market size in 2030?

Ans: The Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market size in 2030 will be US$ 393 million.

Who are the main players in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report?

Ans: The main players in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market are Cuming Microwave, Parker Hannifin, Hexcel, Laird, 3M, TDK, Shenzhen HFC, Tech-Etch, Leader Tech, No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics, Jones Tech, Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology, Beijing Bgrimm New Materials, Mast Technologies, Holland Shielding Systems, EMI Thermal

What are the Application segmentation covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report?

Ans: The Applications covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report are Communication, Defense & Aerospace, Others

What are the Type segmentation covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report?

Ans: The Types covered in the Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market report are Ferrite, Barium Titanate, Graphite, Silicon Carbide, Others

1 Report Overview

1.1 Study Scope

1.2 Market Analysis by Type

1.2.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

1.2.2 Ferrite

1.2.3 Barium Titanate

1.2.4 Graphite

1.2.5 Silicon Carbide

1.2.6 Others

1.3 Market by Application

1.3.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Growth by Application: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

1.3.2 Communication

1.3.3 Defense & Aerospace

1.3.4 Others

1.4 Assumptions and Limitations

1.5 Study Objectives

1.6 Years Considered

2 Global Growth Trends

2.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Perspective (2019-2030)

2.2 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Growth Trends by Region

2.2.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

2.2.2 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Historic Market Size by Region (2019-2024)

2.2.3 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Forecasted Market Size by Region (2025-2030)

2.3 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Dynamics

2.3.1 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Industry Trends

2.3.2 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Drivers

2.3.3 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Challenges

2.3.4 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Restraints

3 Competition Landscape by Key Players

3.1 Global Top Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Players by Revenue

3.1.1 Global Top Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Players by Revenue (2019-2024)

3.1.2 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Players (2019-2024)

3.2 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)

3.3 Global Key Players Ranking by Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue

3.4 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Concentration Ratio

3.4.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)

3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue in 2023

3.5 Global Key Players of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Head office and Area Served

3.6 Global Key Players of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material, Product and Application

3.7 Global Key Players of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material, Date of Enter into This Industry

3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Breakdown Data by Type

4.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Historic Market Size by Type (2019-2024)

4.2 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Forecasted Market Size by Type (2025-2030)

5 Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Breakdown Data by Application

5.1 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Historic Market Size by Application (2019-2024)

5.2 Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Forecasted Market Size by Application (2025-2030)

6 North America

6.1 North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size (2019-2030)

6.2 North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Growth Rate by Country: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

6.3 North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024)

6.4 North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030)

6.5 United States

6.6 Canada

7 Europe

7.1 Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size (2019-2030)

7.2 Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Growth Rate by Country: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

7.3 Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024)

7.4 Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030)

7.5 Germany

7.6 France

7.7 U.K.

7.8 Italy

7.9 Russia

7.10 Nordic Countries

8 Asia-Pacific

8.1 Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size (2019-2030)

8.2 Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Growth Rate by Country: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

8.3 Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region (2019-2024)

8.4 Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region (2025-2030)

8.5 China

8.6 Japan

8.7 South Korea

8.8 Southeast Asia

8.9 India

8.10 Australia

9 Latin America

9.1 Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size (2019-2030)

9.2 Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Growth Rate by Country: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

9.3 Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024)

9.4 Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030)

9.5 Mexico

9.6 Brazil

10 Middle East & Africa

10.1 Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size (2019-2030)

10.2 Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Growth Rate by Country: 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

10.3 Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024)

10.4 Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030)

10.5 Turkey

10.6 Saudi Arabia

10.7 UAE

11 Key Players Profiles

11.1 Cuming Microwave

11.1.1 Cuming Microwave Company Details

11.1.2 Cuming Microwave Business Overview

11.1.3 Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.1.4 Cuming Microwave Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.1.5 Cuming Microwave Recent Development

11.2 Parker Hannifin

11.2.1 Parker Hannifin Company Details

11.2.2 Parker Hannifin Business Overview

11.2.3 Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.2.4 Parker Hannifin Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.2.5 Parker Hannifin Recent Development

11.3 Hexcel

11.3.1 Hexcel Company Details

11.3.2 Hexcel Business Overview

11.3.3 Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.3.4 Hexcel Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.3.5 Hexcel Recent Development

11.4 Laird

11.4.1 Laird Company Details

11.4.2 Laird Business Overview

11.4.3 Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.4.4 Laird Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.4.5 Laird Recent Development

11.5 3M

11.5.1 3M Company Details

11.5.2 3M Business Overview

11.5.3 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.5.4 3M Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.5.5 3M Recent Development

11.6 TDK

11.6.1 TDK Company Details

11.6.2 TDK Business Overview

11.6.3 TDK Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.6.4 TDK Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.6.5 TDK Recent Development

11.7 Shenzhen HFC

11.7.1 Shenzhen HFC Company Details

11.7.2 Shenzhen HFC Business Overview

11.7.3 Shenzhen HFC Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.7.4 Shenzhen HFC Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.7.5 Shenzhen HFC Recent Development

11.8 Tech-Etch

11.8.1 Tech-Etch Company Details

11.8.2 Tech-Etch Business Overview

11.8.3 Tech-Etch Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.8.4 Tech-Etch Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.8.5 Tech-Etch Recent Development

11.9 Leader Tech

11.9.1 Leader Tech Company Details

11.9.2 Leader Tech Business Overview

11.9.3 Leader Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.9.4 Leader Tech Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.9.5 Leader Tech Recent Development

11.10 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics

11.10.1 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Company Details

11.10.2 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Business Overview

11.10.3 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.10.4 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.10.5 No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Recent Development

11.11 Jones Tech

11.11.1 Jones Tech Company Details

11.11.2 Jones Tech Business Overview

11.11.3 Jones Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.11.4 Jones Tech Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.11.5 Jones Tech Recent Development

11.12 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology

11.12.1 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Company Details

11.12.2 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Business Overview

11.12.3 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.12.4 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.12.5 Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Recent Development

11.13 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials

11.13.1 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Company Details

11.13.2 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Business Overview

11.13.3 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.13.4 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.13.5 Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Recent Development

11.14 Mast Technologies

11.14.1 Mast Technologies Company Details

11.14.2 Mast Technologies Business Overview

11.14.3 Mast Technologies Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.14.4 Mast Technologies Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.14.5 Mast Technologies Recent Development

11.15 Holland Shielding Systems

11.15.1 Holland Shielding Systems Company Details

11.15.2 Holland Shielding Systems Business Overview

11.15.3 Holland Shielding Systems Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.15.4 Holland Shielding Systems Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.15.5 Holland Shielding Systems Recent Development

11.16 EMI Thermal

11.16.1 EMI Thermal Company Details

11.16.2 EMI Thermal Business Overview

11.16.3 EMI Thermal Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Introduction

11.16.4 EMI Thermal Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

11.16.5 EMI Thermal Recent Development

12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions

13 Appendix

13.1 Research Methodology

13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach

13.1.1.1 Research Programs/Design

13.1.1.2 Market Size Estimation

13.1.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation

13.1.2 Data Source

13.1.2.1 Secondary Sources

13.1.2.2 Primary Sources

13.2 Author Details

13.3 Disclaimer

FEATURED COMPANIES

Companies

Cuming Microwave

Parker Hannifin

Hexcel

Laird

TDK

Shenzhen HFC

Tech-Etch

Leader Tech

No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics

Jones Tech

Shenzhen FRD Science & Technology

Beijing Bgrimm New Materials

Mast Technologies

Holland Shielding Systems

EMI Thermal

List of Tables

Table 1. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Type (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 2. Key Players of Ferrite

Table 3. Key Players of Barium Titanate

Table 4. Key Players of Graphite

Table 5. Key Players of Silicon Carbide

Table 6. Key Players of Others

Table 7. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth by Application (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 8. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 9. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 10. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Region (2019-2024)

Table 11. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Forecasted Market Size by Region (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 12. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Region (2025-2030)

Table 13. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Trends

Table 14. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Drivers

Table 15. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Challenges

Table 16. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Restraints

Table 17. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue by Players (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 18. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Players (2019-2024)

Table 19. Global Top Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Players by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3) & (based on the Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material as of 2023)

Table 20. Ranking of Global Top Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Companies by Revenue (US$ Million) in 2023

Table 21. Global 5 Largest Players Market Share by Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue (CR5 and HHI) & (2019-2024)

Table 22. Global Key Players of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material, Headquarters and Area Served

Table 23. Global Key Players of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material, Product and Application

Table 24. Global Key Players of Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material, Date of Enter into This Industry

Table 25. Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

Table 26. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Type (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 27. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Type (2019-2024)

Table 28. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Forecasted Market Size by Type (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 29. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Type (2025-2030)

Table 30. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 31. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Application (2019-2024)

Table 32. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Forecasted Market Size by Application (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 33. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue Market Share by Application (2025-2030)

Table 34. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Country (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 35. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 36. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 37. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Country (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 38. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 39. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 40. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Country (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 41. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 42. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Region (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 43. Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Country (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 44. Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 45. Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 46. Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Growth Rate by Country (US$ Million): 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Table 47. Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 48. Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Country (2025-2030) & (US$ Million)

Table 49. Cuming Microwave Company Details

Table 50. Cuming Microwave Business Overview

Table 51. Cuming Microwave Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 52. Cuming Microwave Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 53. Cuming Microwave Recent Development

Table 54. Parker Hannifin Company Details

Table 55. Parker Hannifin Business Overview

Table 56. Parker Hannifin Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 57. Parker Hannifin Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 58. Parker Hannifin Recent Development

Table 59. Hexcel Company Details

Table 60. Hexcel Business Overview

Table 61. Hexcel Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 62. Hexcel Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 63. Hexcel Recent Development

Table 64. Laird Company Details

Table 65. Laird Business Overview

Table 66. Laird Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 67. Laird Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 68. Laird Recent Development

Table 69. 3M Company Details

Table 70. 3M Business Overview

Table 71. 3M Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 72. 3M Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 73. 3M Recent Development

Table 74. TDK Company Details

Table 75. TDK Business Overview

Table 76. TDK Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 77. TDK Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 78. TDK Recent Development

Table 79. Shenzhen HFC Company Details

Table 80. Shenzhen HFC Business Overview

Table 81. Shenzhen HFC Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 82. Shenzhen HFC Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 83. Shenzhen HFC Recent Development

Table 84. Tech-Etch Company Details

Table 85. Tech-Etch Business Overview

Table 86. Tech-Etch Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 87. Tech-Etch Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 88. Tech-Etch Recent Development

Table 89. Leader Tech Company Details

Table 90. Leader Tech Business Overview

Table 91. Leader Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 92. Leader Tech Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 93. Leader Tech Recent Development

Table 94. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Company Details

Table 95. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Business Overview

Table 96. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 97. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 98. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Recent Development

Table 99. Jones Tech Company Details

Table 100. Jones Tech Business Overview

Table 101. Jones Tech Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 102. Jones Tech Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 103. Jones Tech Recent Development

Table 104. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Company Details

Table 105. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Business Overview

Table 106. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 107. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 108. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Recent Development

Table 109. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Company Details

Table 110. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Business Overview

Table 111. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 112. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 113. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Recent Development

Table 114. Mast Technologies Company Details

Table 115. Mast Technologies Business Overview

Table 116. Mast Technologies Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 117. Mast Technologies Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 118. Mast Technologies Recent Development

Table 119. Holland Shielding Systems Company Details

Table 120. Holland Shielding Systems Business Overview

Table 121. Holland Shielding Systems Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 122. Holland Shielding Systems Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 123. Holland Shielding Systems Recent Development

Table 124. EMI Thermal Company Details

Table 125. EMI Thermal Business Overview

Table 126. EMI Thermal Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Product

Table 127. EMI Thermal Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024) & (US$ Million)

Table 128. EMI Thermal Recent Development

Table 129. Research Programs/Design for This Report

Table 130. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources

Table 131. Key Data Information from Primary Sources

Table 132. Authors List of This Report

List of Figures

Figure 1. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Picture

Figure 2. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size Comparison by Type (2024-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 3. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Type: 2023 VS 2030

Figure 4. Ferrite Features

Figure 5. Barium Titanate Features

Figure 6. Graphite Features

Figure 7. Silicon Carbide Features

Figure 8. Others Features

Figure 9. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size by Application (2024-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 10. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Application: 2023 VS 2030

Figure 11. Communication Case Studies

Figure 12. Defense & Aerospace Case Studies

Figure 13. Others Case Studies

Figure 14. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Report Years Considered

Figure 15. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size (US$ Million), Year-over-Year: 2019-2030

Figure 16. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size, (US$ Million), 2019 VS 2023 VS 2030

Figure 17. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Region: 2023 VS 2030

Figure 18. Global Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Players in 2023

Figure 19. Global Top Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Players by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3) & (based on the Revenue in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material as of 2023)

Figure 20. The Top 10 and 5 Players Market Share by Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Revenue in 2023

Figure 21. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 22. North America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Country (2019-2030)

Figure 23. United States Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 24. Canada Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 25. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 26. Europe Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Country (2019-2030)

Figure 27. Germany Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 28. France Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 29. U.K. Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 30. Italy Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 31. Russia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 32. Nordic Countries Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 33. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 34. Asia-Pacific Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Region (2019-2030)

Figure 35. China Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 36. Japan Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 37. South Korea Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 38. Southeast Asia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 39. India Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 40. Australia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 41. Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 42. Latin America Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Country (2019-2030)

Figure 43. Mexico Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 44. Brazil Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 45. Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 46. Middle East & Africa Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Share by Country (2019-2030)

Figure 47. Turkey Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 48. Saudi Arabia Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 49. UAE Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Market Size YoY Growth (2019-2030) & (US$ Million)

Figure 50. Cuming Microwave Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 51. Parker Hannifin Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 52. Hexcel Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 53. Laird Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 54. 3M Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 55. TDK Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 56. Shenzhen HFC Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 57. Tech-Etch Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 58. Leader Tech Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 59. No.33 Research Institute of China Electronics Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 60. Jones Tech Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 61. Shenzhen FRD Science& Technology Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 62. Beijing Bgrimm New Materials Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 63. Mast Technologies Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 64. Holland Shielding Systems Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 65. EMI Thermal Revenue Growth Rate in Traditional Electromagnetic Wave Absorbing Material Business (2019-2024)

Figure 66. Bottom-up and Top-down Approaches for This Report

Figure 67. Data Triangulation

Figure 68. Key Executives Interviewed

SELECT A FORMAT

Added to Cart

Single User